Intel Arc A750 vs Intel Arc B570
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A750 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 10GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 380 GB/s |
| Shaders | 3584 | 2304 |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 150W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Xe2 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,607 | 2,645 |
| Best Price | $200 | $219 |
| Value Score | 81/100 | 85/100 |
Verdict
The Intel Arc B570 is faster but costs more. The Intel Arc A750 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
Intel Arc A750 vs Intel Arc B570: Which Should You Buy?
These two land on top of each other: 56.1 fps versus 53.7 fps at 1440p ultra, a 4% difference you will not notice in a game. The decision comes down to price, VRAM and power draw rather than speed.
You pay a 10% premium for the Intel Arc B570 ($219 against $200) to get 4% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the Intel Arc A750 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: the Intel Arc B570 draws 75W less (150W versus 225W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the Intel Arc B570 is 3 years newer (2025 versus 2022), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.