Intel Arc A750 vs Intel Arc B580
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A750 | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 456 GB/s |
| Shaders | 3584 | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | 2850 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 190W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Xe2 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,607 | 3,062 |
| Best Price | $200 | $249 |
| Value Score | 81/100 | 92/100 |
Verdict
The Intel Arc B580 is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
Intel Arc A750 vs Intel Arc B580: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The Intel Arc B580 delivers 68.5 fps at 1440p ultra to the Intel Arc A750's 53.7 fps, a 28% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 25% premium for the Intel Arc B580 ($249 against $200) to get 28% more frames. The extra performance more than covers the extra cost.
Two things beyond raw speed: Intel Arc B580 carries 12GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the Intel Arc B580 is 2 years newer (2024 versus 2022), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.