Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Shaders | 3584 | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 130W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,607 | 1,331 |
| Best Price | $200 | $219 |
| Value Score | 81/100 | 53/100 |
Verdict
The Intel Arc A750 is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The Intel Arc A750 delivers 53.7 fps at 1440p ultra to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB's 38.5 fps, a 39% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
Pricing settles it: the Intel Arc A750 is both faster and 10% cheaper at $200 versus $219. There is no scenario in this pairing where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is the better buy at these prices.
Two things beyond raw speed: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB draws 95W less (130W versus 225W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case.