Intel Arc A750 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 7600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Shaders | 3584 | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | 2755 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 190W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 3.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,607 | 2,348 |
| Best Price | $200 | $329 |
| Value Score | 81/100 | 67/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is faster but costs more. The Intel Arc A750 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
Intel Arc A750 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT delivers 65.9 fps at 1440p ultra to the Intel Arc A750's 53.7 fps, a 23% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 65% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ($329 against $200) to get 23% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the Intel Arc A750 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is 2 years newer (2024 versus 2022), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.