Intel Arc A770 vs Intel Arc B570
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A770 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 10GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 560 GB/s | 380 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4096 | 2304 |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 150W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Xe2 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,974 | 2,645 |
| Best Price | $329 | $219 |
| Value Score | 55/100 | 85/100 |
Verdict
The Intel Arc A770 is faster but costs more. The Intel Arc B570 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
Intel Arc A770 vs Intel Arc B570: Which Should You Buy?
The Intel Arc A770 is 7% faster at 1440p ultra (59.8 fps against 56.1 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
You pay a 50% premium for the Intel Arc A770 ($329 against $219) to get 7% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the Intel Arc B570 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: Intel Arc A770 carries 16GB against 10GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 10GB cards age badly; and the Intel Arc B570 draws 75W less (150W versus 225W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the Intel Arc B570 is 3 years newer (2025 versus 2022), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.