Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 560 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4096 | 4864 |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 200W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,974 | 2,678 |
| Best Price | $329 | $399 |
| Value Score | 55/100 | 44/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is faster but costs more. The Intel Arc A770 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: Which Should You Buy?
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 17% faster at 1440p ultra (70 fps against 59.8 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
You pay a 21% premium for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ($399 against $329) to get 17% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the Intel Arc A770 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: Intel Arc A770 carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the Intel Arc A770 is 2 years newer (2022 versus 2020), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.