Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 560 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4096 | 4352 |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2535 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 165W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,974 | 2,919 |
| Best Price | $329 | $499 |
| Value Score | 55/100 | 46/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is faster but costs more. The Intel Arc A770 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB delivers 75.7 fps at 1440p ultra to the Intel Arc A770's 59.8 fps, a 27% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 52% premium for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB ($499 against $329) to get 27% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the Intel Arc A770 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB draws 60W less (165W versus 225W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case.