Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 560 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4096 | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2572 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 130W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,974 | 2,317 |
| Best Price | $329 | $249 |
| Value Score | 55/100 | 76/100 |
Verdict
The Intel Arc A770 is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050: Which Should You Buy?
These two land on top of each other: 59.8 fps versus 57.1 fps at 1440p ultra, a 5% difference you will not notice in a game. The decision comes down to price, VRAM and power draw rather than speed.
You pay a 32% premium for the Intel Arc A770 ($329 against $249) to get 5% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: Intel Arc A770 carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 draws 95W less (130W versus 225W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is 3 years newer (2025 versus 2022), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.