Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A770 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 560 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4096 | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2589 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 160W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,974 | 1,797 |
| Best Price | $329 | $379 |
| Value Score | 55/100 | 34/100 |
Verdict
The Intel Arc A770 is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT: Which Should You Buy?
The Intel Arc A770 is 15% faster at 1440p ultra (59.8 fps against 52.2 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
Pricing settles it: the Intel Arc A770 is both faster and 15% cheaper at $329 versus $379. There is no scenario in this pairing where the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is the better buy at these prices.
Two things beyond raw speed: Intel Arc A770 carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT draws 65W less (160W versus 225W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case.