Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A770 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 560 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4096 | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 3130 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 160W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 4.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,974 | 3,719 |
| Best Price | $329 | $299 |
| Value Score | 55/100 | 87/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB delivers 77.9 fps at 1440p ultra to the Intel Arc A770's 59.8 fps, a 30% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
Pricing settles it: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is both faster and 10% cheaper at $299 versus $329. There is no scenario in this pairing where the Intel Arc A770 is the better buy at these prices.
Two things beyond raw speed: Intel Arc A770 carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB draws 65W less (160W versus 225W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 3 years newer (2025 versus 2022), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.