NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
🖥️ 1080p GamingGTX 1650 +2%
5756
🎮 1440p GamingGTX 1650 +2%
5352
📺 4K Gaming
3434
💡 Ray TracingGTX 1650 +4%
2423
⚡ ProductivityGTX 1650 +2%
5049
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | — | — |
| Shaders | — | — |
| Boost Clock | — | — |
| TDP | 75W | 53W |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 269 | 162 |
| Best Price | $149 | $159 |
| Value Score | 43/100 | 59/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400: Which Should You Buy?
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 features 8GB of GDDR6 memory built on the Turing architecture, while the AMD Radeon RX 6400 comes with 8GB GDDR6 on RDNA 2.0. In 1440p gaming benchmarks, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2%.
At current prices ($149 vs $159), the AMD Radeon RX 6400 offers better value with a score of 59/100 compared to 43/100. Power consumption also differs: 75W vs 53W TDP.