NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 11GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 616 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 5120 |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| TDP | 250W | 300W |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 3,524 | 4,065 |
| Best Price | $999 | $999 |
| Value Score | 15/100 | 26/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT delivers 102.1 fps at 1440p ultra to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti's 75.6 fps, a 35% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
Prices are within 0% of each other ($999 and $999), so the faster card is the obvious pick unless a spec below rules it out for your build.
Two things beyond raw speed: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT carries 16GB against 11GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 11GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti draws 50W less (250W versus 300W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 2 years newer (2020 versus 2018), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.