NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Shaders | 2560 | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2589 MHz |
| TDP | 130W | 160W |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 1,331 | 1,797 |
| Best Price | $219 | $379 |
| Value Score | 53/100 | 34/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT delivers 52.2 fps at 1440p ultra to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB's 38.5 fps, a 36% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 73% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT ($379 against $219) to get 36% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is the better value here.