NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 280 GB/s |
| Shaders | 2560 | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2635 MHz |
| TDP | 130W | 176W |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 1,331 | 1,854 |
| Best Price | $219 | $399 |
| Value Score | 53/100 | 41/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT delivers 54.5 fps at 1440p ultra to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB's 38.5 fps, a 42% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 82% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT ($399 against $219) to get 42% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB draws 46W less (130W versus 176W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case.