NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4864 | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| TDP | 200W | 250W |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,678 | 2,540 |
| Best Price | $399 | $549 |
| Value Score | 44/100 | 42/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT: Which Should You Buy?
The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 10% faster at 1440p ultra (77.2 fps against 70 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
You pay a 38% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ($549 against $399) to get 10% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT carries 12GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 50W less (200W versus 250W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 2 years newer (2022 versus 2020), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.