NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 1905 MHz |
| TDP | 165W | 225W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,919 | 2,123 |
| Best Price | $499 | $399 |
| Value Score | 46/100 | 27/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB delivers 75.7 fps at 1440p ultra to the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT's 53.1 fps, a 43% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 25% premium for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB ($499 against $399) to get 43% more frames. The extra performance more than covers the extra cost.
Two things beyond raw speed: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB draws 60W less (165W versus 225W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 4 years newer (2023 versus 2019), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.