NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 3840 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2105 MHz |
| TDP | 165W | 250W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,919 | 3,185 |
| Best Price | $499 | $579 |
| Value Score | 46/100 | 39/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6800: Which Should You Buy?
The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is 18% faster at 1440p ultra (89.2 fps against 75.7 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
You pay a 16% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6800 ($579 against $499) to get 18% more frames. The extra performance more than covers the extra cost.
Two things beyond raw speed: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB draws 85W less (165W versus 250W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3 years newer (2023 versus 2020), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.