NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 3130 MHz |
| TDP | 165W | 160W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 4.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,919 | 3,719 |
| Best Price | $499 | $299 |
| Value Score | 46/100 | 87/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB: Which Should You Buy?
These two land on top of each other: 77.9 fps versus 75.7 fps at 1440p ultra, a 3% difference you will not notice in a game. The decision comes down to price, VRAM and power draw rather than speed.
Pricing settles it: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is both faster and 67% cheaper at $299 versus $499. There is no scenario in this pairing where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is the better buy at these prices.
Two things beyond raw speed: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 2 years newer (2025 versus 2023), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.