NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 3072 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| TDP | 165W | 220W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 4.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,919 | 5,141 |
| Best Price | $499 | $549 |
| Value Score | 46/100 | 64/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE delivers 105 fps at 1440p ultra to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB's 75.7 fps, a 39% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 10% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE ($549 against $499) to get 39% more frames. The extra performance more than covers the extra cost.
Two things beyond raw speed: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB carries 16GB against 12GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 12GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB draws 55W less (165W versus 220W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2 years newer (2025 versus 2023), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.