NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| TDP | 160W | 230W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,919 | 2,427 |
| Best Price | $399 | $479 |
| Value Score | 57/100 | 38/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT: Which Should You Buy?
These two land on top of each other: 75.6 fps versus 73.4 fps at 1440p ultra, a 3% difference you will not notice in a game. The decision comes down to price, VRAM and power draw rather than speed.
Pricing settles it: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is both faster and 20% cheaper at $399 versus $479. There is no scenario in this pairing where the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the better buy at these prices.
Two things beyond raw speed: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT carries 12GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 70W less (160W versus 230W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is 2 years newer (2023 versus 2021), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.