NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 3840 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2105 MHz |
| TDP | 160W | 250W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,919 | 3,185 |
| Best Price | $399 | $579 |
| Value Score | 57/100 | 39/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6800: Which Should You Buy?
The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is 18% faster at 1440p ultra (89.2 fps against 75.6 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
You pay a 45% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6800 ($579 against $399) to get 18% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: AMD Radeon RX 6800 carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 90W less (160W versus 250W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is 3 years newer (2023 versus 2020), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.