NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 624 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 3840 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2430 MHz |
| TDP | 160W | 263W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,919 | 4,154 |
| Best Price | $399 | $499 |
| Value Score | 57/100 | 64/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT delivers 105.8 fps at 1440p ultra to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 75.6 fps, a 40% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 25% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT ($499 against $399) to get 40% more frames. The extra performance more than covers the extra cost.
Two things beyond raw speed: AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 103W less (160W versus 263W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case.