NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Shaders | 3840 | 5120 |
| Boost Clock | 2497 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| TDP | 180W | 300W |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 3,573 | 4,065 |
| Best Price | $279 | $999 |
| Value Score | 100/100 | 26/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT: Which Should You Buy?
The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 9% faster at 1440p ultra (102.1 fps against 93.4 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
You pay a 258% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT ($999 against $279) to get 9% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB draws 120W less (180W versus 300W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is 5 years newer (2025 versus 2020), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.