nvidiaGTX 16

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Entry Level GPU • Best for 1080p MediumTuring Architecture • 6GB GDDR6

Value Score
23.9
Rating
Poor Value
Current Prices
Amazon (New)
Check current price
Check
MSRP$279
ReleasedJan 2019

Gaming Benchmarks

1080p Ultra46.6 fps
1440p Ultra33.3 fps
4K Ultra
Ray Tracing (1440p DXR)
Productivity (score)81

Frame rates measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means this card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity is a synthetic score, not fps.

Specifications

ArchitectureTuring
GPU ChipTU116
VRAM6GB GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth288 GB/s
Memory Bus192-bit
Shaders / CUDA Cores1,536
Boost Clock1770 MHz
TDP / Power Draw120W
Process NodeTSMC 12FFN
Ray TracingYes
Release Year2019

3DMark Scores

Steel Nomad1,052

Recommended PSU for GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

350W
Minimum recommended PSU wattage
Based on 120W GPU TDP + system overhead

GTX 1660 Ti performance analysis

Derived from the benchmark and specification figures above, ranked against the 77 current cards in the database.

GTX 1660 Ti percentile ranks across five derived metrics Frames per watt: 0.28 fps/W, 30th percentile of 77 current cards. Frames per $100: 11.9 fps/$100, 31st percentile of 77 current cards. Bandwidth per pixel: 2,346 B/px, 79th percentile of 77 current cards Frames per watt 30th · 0.28 fps/W Frames per $100 31st · 11.9 fps/$100 Bandwidth per pixel 79th · 2,346 B/px
Percentile rank among 77 current cards, computed from the benchmark and specification data on this page. Bars at or above the 50th percentile are shown in the brand colour.

The GTX 1660 Ti's strongest measured trait is bandwidth per pixel at 2,346 B/px, which puts it in the 79th percentile — that metric describes memory bandwidth available for every pixel it draws at 1440p. Its weakest is frames per watt at 0.28 fps/W (30th percentile). That is a wide spread for a single card: it is specialised rather than balanced, and whether it suits you depends on which of the two you actually load.

Board power against 1440p frame rate, with the GTX 1660 Ti highlighted GTX 1660 Ti draws 120 W for 33.3 fps at 1440p. Cards plotted above the dashed line deliver more frames per watt; cards below deliver fewer. 200 150 100 50 0 0 150 300 450 600 GTX 1660 Ti efficiency line GTX 1660 Ti Board power (W) 1440p average fps
Every current card, power on the horizontal axis and 1440p frame rate on the vertical. The dashed line is the GTX 1660 Ti's own efficiency; anything above it converts watts into frames more effectively.

The GTX 1660 Ti turns a 120W board power budget into 33.3 fps at 1440p, or 0.28 fps/W against a pool median of 0.32 fps/W. Power, not transistor count, is the binding constraint on a modern GPU — Dennard scaling stopped holding around 2005, and Esmaeilzadeh and colleagues showed at ISCA 2011 that the fraction of a chip that can be powered at full speed shrinks with every node (“dark silicon”). Frames per watt is the shortest honest summary of what an architecture is doing with that budget.

For scale: the closest NVIDIA card from an earlier generation is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (2016), at 33.1 fps and 150W. The GTX 1660 Ti is the same speed while drawing 30W less.

Every rendered pixel has to be fed from memory. At 1440p the GTX 1660 Ti has 2,346 B/px of memory bandwidth available per pixel it draws, against a median of 1,808 B/px comfortably fed, so its shaders are the limit before its memory is. This is the roofline model applied to a game frame: Williams, Waterman and Patterson (Communications of the ACM, 2009) showed that any workload runs into either a compute ceiling or a memory-bandwidth ceiling, and that the ratio of the two is what decides which one you hit.

The GTX 1660 Ti ranks #71 in 3DMark Steel Nomad but #68 on the 1440p game average — 3 places higher in real games than the synthetic implies. Steel Nomad is a 4K, non-ray-traced pass with heavy async compute and no upscaling, so it rewards raw shader and bandwidth throughput and ignores driver overhead, geometry front-end limits, and everything a game engine does outside the compute path. A gap this size means the card punches above its raw throughput in actual games.

On memory capacity, the GTX 1660 Ti carries 6GB against a median of 6GB across the 3 other cards within 10% of its 1440p frame rate. That matches its class, so capacity is unlikely to be the first thing that limits it.

Method: percentiles are computed over the 77 non-legacy cards with a 1440p figure. Frame rates come from Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy; specifications from manufacturer datasheets. Theoretical FP32 TFLOPS is deliberately not used as a cross-vendor comparison — RDNA 3 and 4 dual-issue FP32 doubles the paper figure without doubling game performance, and AMD itself declined to count it as extra shaders. The measured Steel Nomad score is used as the compute proxy instead. GPURanker does not run its own benchmarks.

Is the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Worth It in 2026?

At $279, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 24/100 on our Value Scale. There may be better options in this price range offering more performance per dollar.

You'll need at least a 350W PSU to run this card reliably (120W TDP).

As a budget option under $300, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is great for 1080p gaming and light creative work.

Alternatives to consider: GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB ($219, Value: 53/100), Radeon RX 6600 ($219, Value: 51/100)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Overview

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a entry level graphics card built on NVIDIA's Turing architecture using a TSMC 12FFN manufacturing process. With 6GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, it targets 1080p medium gaming.

At its current best price of $279, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti earns a Value Score of 24/100 — rated as "Poor Value". Its 120W TDP makes it efficient and suitable for most builds.