NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Shaders | 2560 | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| TDP | 130W | 230W |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,317 | 2,427 |
| Best Price | $249 | $479 |
| Value Score | 76/100 | 38/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers 73.4 fps at 1440p ultra to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050's 57.1 fps, a 29% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 92% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT ($479 against $249) to get 29% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT carries 12GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 draws 100W less (130W versus 230W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is 4 years newer (2025 versus 2021), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.