AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 12GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Shaders | 2560 | 5120 |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| TDP | 230W | 300W |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,427 | 4,065 |
| Best Price | $479 | $999 |
| Value Score | 38/100 | 26/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is faster but costs more. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT delivers 102.1 fps at 1440p ultra to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT's 73.4 fps, a 39% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 109% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT ($999 against $479) to get 39% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT carries 16GB against 12GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 12GB cards age badly; and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT draws 70W less (230W versus 300W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case.